Your patients are more complex than their records show.
ClinIntell gives you a condition-by-condition view of documentation variation across your own patients. When providers engage with that data, queries go down, the medical record gets more accurate, and reimbursement reflects the clinical complexity you're already managing.
Accurate documentation isn't just an institutional concern.
When the record reflects the true complexity of a patient, the next provider who picks them up sees what you saw.
Risk-adjusted outcomes, the ones your performance gets measured against, reflect the complexity you were actually managing rather than a flatter version of it.
And when the hospital is reimbursed for the patients it's actually caring for, that shows up in the staffing, the technology, and the conditions you work in every day.
This isn't another CDI program. It's a different conversation, grounded in your own patient data, about where documentation standards vary across a medical staff and what to do about it.
The variation has been invisible, and that's why nothing has changed
The way the same clinical condition gets documented varies across a medical staff. Different thresholds, different language, different levels of specificity. That's a clinical standards problem, not an individual one. It can only be seen from a vantage point that takes in the whole inpatient population at once. No single chart shows it, and no provider working from their own cases has that view.
CDI catches individual gaps after the fact and sends a query, but a query addresses one chart. It doesn't resolve the underlying variation in clinical standards across the staff, which is why the most commonly queried conditions 10 years ago are still the same today.
What chart-level tools show you
- A gap on a specific chart
- Which of your charts were queried
- Whether you responded to a query
- That a query was answered and the chart closed
What they can't show you
- The difference between the expected and actual coded rate for a condition across your patients over the past year
- Which of the 350+ conditions have the largest variation in your specific population of patients
- For each of the 350+ conditions, how your documentation gap compares to other physicians in the same specialty at your particular hospital
- Insight on which conditions you can document more consistently in order to avoid queries in the future
See documentation variation in your own patient population, condition by condition
ClinIntell analyzes your hospital's inpatient claims data and shows where documentation for the same clinical conditions varies across the medical staff. Not a peer benchmark against other hospitals. Not a chart review. A view of how the conditions you treat are being documented across your own patient population, measured against clinically expected rates.
Here's what using ClinIntell actually looks like as a provider.
Learn on your own time
Apply at the point of
documentation
Review monthly
performance
Commonly asked questions
You’re being asked to: Look at documentation data for your own patient population, presented in clinical terms. Get aligned on clinical thresholds for the conditions where documentation varies most across the medical staff — on your own time, through ClinIntell's mobile app. Apply those thresholds going forward in your documentation.
That's the full ask. No new query workflow, no change to how you practice clinically.
The work goes down over time, not up. Queries on a condition exist because the underlying documentation variation hasn't been resolved. When providers align on the clinical thresholds and apply them, queries on those conditions drop.
CDI works one chart at a time. A case closes, a reviewer flags a gap, a query goes out, the chart gets updated. The next case starts from the same place. ClinIntell sits one level up. It shows where documentation for the same condition varies across the medical staff so the variation can be resolved at the source, not managed retrospectively case by case.
For providers, that means the conversation is clinical, not transactional. It's about diagnostic thresholds and how the conditions you treat are being documented across all clinicians — not about a specific chart, a specific DRG, or a specific query response. You see the data for your own patients, and the changes you make show up downstream as fewer queries and a record that more accurately reflects the patients you're managing.
Trusted by providers at hospitals and health systems across the country
The providers who get the most out of ClinIntell are the ones who give the upfront alignment work the time it needs. That means looking at the data for their own patients, getting clear on the clinical thresholds for the conditions where documentation varies most, and applying them going forward. That's what turns population-level data into a record that reflects the patients you're actually managing, and a CMI that reflects what your hospital is actually treating
02. Clinical conversation with providers
03. Documentation aligned to standardized clinical criteria
05. Reduced query volume over time
06. Resources back into clinical operations
When providers see their own gaps, they engage differently than with a generic query. That behavioral change drives durable improvement in CMI and LOS accuracy.
ClinIntell has given us insight on drivers of CMI and Quality, directing our focus to key diagnoses and helping us address opportunities at a
group and individual level.
Very concise and high yield. There will be immediate impact to my personal documentation.
Years of queries haven't closed the gap. There's a reason, and it's finally visible.
Book a call — see the top 5 conditions with the largest documentation variation across your patient population.
.svg)